RAWVSRAW

Adobe wants you to convert everything to DNG. Is it safer? Or just a trap? The debate settles here.

The Verdict

**DNG is safer for the long term.** Proprietery RAW files (CR2, NEF) might not be supported in 50 years. DNG is an open standard document. However, conversion takes time.

File Size

Winner: RAW

DNG files are often 10-20% smaller than their CR2/NEF counterparts because Adobe uses lossless compression efficiency.

Compatibility

Winner: RAW

Old versions of Lightroom can't open new camera RAW files, but they CAN open DNG. Conversion bridges the gap.

Metadata sidebar

Winner: RAW

DNG embeds the edits (XMP) inside the file. RAW requires a separate .xmp sidecar file. DNG is cleaner for file management.

Ready to switch formats?